<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anything but the last 4 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stacker 3 diet pills</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15200</link>
		<dc:creator>stacker 3 diet pills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15200</guid>
		<description>stacker 3 diet pills

You are invited to check the pages dedicated to top 10 diet pills</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stacker 3 diet pills</p>
<p>You are invited to check the pages dedicated to top 10 diet pills</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vd Pkr Strtgy</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15198</link>
		<dc:creator>Vd Pkr Strtgy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 07:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15198</guid>
		<description>Vd Pkr Strtgy

You are invited to check the sites on Wrld srs f pkr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vd Pkr Strtgy</p>
<p>You are invited to check the sites on Wrld srs f pkr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nora sumi park</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15195</link>
		<dc:creator>nora sumi park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 07:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15195</guid>
		<description>what happened to oranckay's site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what happened to oranckay&#8217;s site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15194</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15194</guid>
		<description>Or "theocon"!!

Thanks, virtual wonderer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or &#8220;theocon&#8221;!!</p>
<p>Thanks, virtual wonderer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15193</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15193</guid>
		<description>Oranckay said:

Such hate from so many above. Of me, not Bush?€?

Not hate.  Don't flatter yourself.

You are the subject of this post, which automatically elevated your status to that of an expert.  Then someone questioned your credibility - i.e. that you may have an overriding motivation at work, the desire to see Bush humiliated.

A fair question to ask, and something that readers here should know, if true.

Seems the truth hurts.  So you call it "hate," to instantly invalidate it. How convenient.  

Next time call it "pro-Bush neocon drivel."  Or that old stand-by, "racism."  Mix it up a bit.

If you don't think you have the overriding motivation mentioned above, ask yourself how you felt when Plamegate broke, or Abu Ghraib.  Were you not hoping that Bush would be humiliated?  Were you not hoping for another Watergate?  The welfare of the country, and the world, be damned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oranckay said:</p>
<p>Such hate from so many above. Of me, not Bush?€?</p>
<p>Not hate.  Don&#8217;t flatter yourself.</p>
<p>You are the subject of this post, which automatically elevated your status to that of an expert.  Then someone questioned your credibility - i.e. that you may have an overriding motivation at work, the desire to see Bush humiliated.</p>
<p>A fair question to ask, and something that readers here should know, if true.</p>
<p>Seems the truth hurts.  So you call it &#8220;hate,&#8221; to instantly invalidate it. How convenient.  </p>
<p>Next time call it &#8220;pro-Bush neocon drivel.&#8221;  Or that old stand-by, &#8220;racism.&#8221;  Mix it up a bit.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t think you have the overriding motivation mentioned above, ask yourself how you felt when Plamegate broke, or Abu Ghraib.  Were you not hoping that Bush would be humiliated?  Were you not hoping for another Watergate?  The welfare of the country, and the world, be damned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual wonderer</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15192</link>
		<dc:creator>virtual wonderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15192</guid>
		<description>God...  I guess only people who can consider themsevles pro-bush these days are people who think bombing Iraqis is a good idea.

Doesn't matter if you are a fiscal conservative or a theocon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God&#8230;  I guess only people who can consider themsevles pro-bush these days are people who think bombing Iraqis is a good idea.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t matter if you are a fiscal conservative or a theocon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baduk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15191</link>
		<dc:creator>baduk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15191</guid>
		<description>Nomad,

I absolutely agree with your assessment of the situation.  And, I love your "as long as the NORKs consider their southern counterpart as a bitch to slap around" remark.  Pres. Rho and all SKs should hear this.

A bitch to slap around...Nora, don't get worked up..A bitch can be a man.  The term has become gender-neutral circa 1990.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nomad,</p>
<p>I absolutely agree with your assessment of the situation.  And, I love your &#8220;as long as the NORKs consider their southern counterpart as a bitch to slap around&#8221; remark.  Pres. Rho and all SKs should hear this.</p>
<p>A bitch to slap around&#8230;Nora, don&#8217;t get worked up..A bitch can be a man.  The term has become gender-neutral circa 1990.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15190</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15190</guid>
		<description>Say the Nomad: "They may as well threaten to tell the Easter Bunny, that may have more of an effect. "

Heck yeah! Better than what's not happening now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say the Nomad: &#8220;They may as well threaten to tell the Easter Bunny, that may have more of an effect. &#8221;</p>
<p>Heck yeah! Better than what&#8217;s not happening now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Thacker</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15189</link>
		<dc:creator>John Thacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15189</guid>
		<description>1.  A military attack right now is not only a bad idea, but completely impossible due to the damage it would cause to the ROK.

2.  Cutting a deal to give the DPRK free stuff is a bad idea, since they've already shown that they don't stick to deals.

3.  Considering the makeup of the Security Council, and that the UK and France don't really care about the DPRK, the six-party talks already include the important people necessary to get something passed.  Russia and the PRC's approval is necessary.

4.  Considering the insane DPRK economy and their history, it's not clear that sanctions would have much of an effort-- but again, the only sanctions that would really make a difference are from the nations involved in the six party talks.

5.  The UN and the Security Council make a big fetish of negotiations.  It's helpful to show that they "aren't working," and it's necessary to get a united front from the neighboring countries in order to get something actually passed.

6.  When all the alternatives are unacceptable, doing nothing is sometimes the best choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  A military attack right now is not only a bad idea, but completely impossible due to the damage it would cause to the ROK.</p>
<p>2.  Cutting a deal to give the DPRK free stuff is a bad idea, since they&#8217;ve already shown that they don&#8217;t stick to deals.</p>
<p>3.  Considering the makeup of the Security Council, and that the UK and France don&#8217;t really care about the DPRK, the six-party talks already include the important people necessary to get something passed.  Russia and the PRC&#8217;s approval is necessary.</p>
<p>4.  Considering the insane DPRK economy and their history, it&#8217;s not clear that sanctions would have much of an effort&#8211; but again, the only sanctions that would really make a difference are from the nations involved in the six party talks.</p>
<p>5.  The UN and the Security Council make a big fetish of negotiations.  It&#8217;s helpful to show that they &#8220;aren&#8217;t working,&#8221; and it&#8217;s necessary to get a united front from the neighboring countries in order to get something actually passed.</p>
<p>6.  When all the alternatives are unacceptable, doing nothing is sometimes the best choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2005/04/27/anything-but-the-last-4-years/#comment-15188</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1574#comment-15188</guid>
		<description>Oranckay said:

I?€™m as pro-Bush as can be on this issue.

That makes me the frickin easter bunny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oranckay said:</p>
<p>I?€™m as pro-Bush as can be on this issue.</p>
<p>That makes me the frickin easter bunny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
