most lesbians (yeah, the word ‘lez’ is still one of those words that’s a bit offensive, unless the person using it is one herself, using it with a sense of irony) have ‘tried’ other men. when the first they tried didn’t work, they seek another type, until they realize what they really want and need is another woman.

i know what you’re saying about men adapting, but it’s like this analogy: no matter how you market a vacuum cleaner, it still isn’t a hairdryer. effeminate men is not what does it for me. it’s hard to explain….

would you want an effeminate man going down on you? if not, then why would i?

by the way, my sexual orientation is probably the least important of my defining characteristics these days. i almost regret including that in my blog’s intro, but to some degree it does inform my view of the world, so i thought it important to be upfront.

Are you sure you are lez? Try some Korean men. Some of them are pretty effeminate, especially before going to military service. They are almost school girl with male genitals.

Try them. Maybe you are turn off by European style manhood. Korean males have tender, emotional and vulnerable side somewhat like European females.

Males are quickly changing these days to adopt and survive. You may find some who are “socially evolved” enough to possess the same qualities you look for in a woman.

I am not knocking your sexual orientation. I am just suggesting “alternate lifestyle” back to socially accepted form.

Forgive me if I have offended you in any way.

we also like bush, but just not this one.

i thought lesbians liked tools?

March 10th, 2005 at 8:30 pm
I would just like to pop in here and point out that this guy isn??t me. ”

Ah, come on! Don’t be bashful. I am you. I’m your altered ego. Don’t you recognize me?

let me say up front, i’m not responsible for his gambling debts.

“..domestic policy does not define neoconservatism; it is a movement founded on, and perpetuated by an aggressive approach to foreign policy, free trade, opposition to communism during the Cold War”

I understand that she’s just using the term perjoratively to refer to the modern party defined and led by Bush, but maybe it would be more accurate to refer to her ideological enemies as Paleo-conservatives, like
Pat Buchanan, who’s opposition to aggressive foreign policy AND support for a conservative domestic agenda fit her pigeon hole much better.