<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Norbert Conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 18:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MLS</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8822</link>
		<dc:creator>MLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 02:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8822</guid>
		<description>Oranckay!  Bring it on! Hamel knows me, so name the parking lot and we'll do alot of discussing!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oranckay!  Bring it on! Hamel knows me, so name the parking lot and we&#8217;ll do alot of discussing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8821</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 03:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8821</guid>
		<description>If Roh &#38; friends are doing terrible things, then stating what those things are should make the problems obvious enough. One should not have to exaggerate or accuse it of things that (1) it cannot help, like among many other things China's behavior or (2) things that are what any SK government would do, even prior and Kim Dae Jung, or that can be understood in the context of SK culture, history, and politics. Note that on April 13, 1994 the Chosun Ilbo accused the government of not doing anything about NK defectors, "even though they have been an issue for a considerable amount of time." Kindly remember that Kim Young Sam became president 1993. He was preceded by Roh Tae Woo, the former general. The GNP was the ruling and majority party under both Roh Tae Woo and Kim Young Sam, though several transformations &#38; name changes ago (the Democratic Liberal Party, then the New Korea Party). Charges coming from the GNP (or the GNP as a whole, anyway, since there are many healthy-thinking individuals among its ranks) that Roh Moo Hyun is doing the wrong thing or not doing enough about NK and defectors is politically motivated. 

I'm not sure that Roh Moo Hyun can't do more. Maybe he can, maybe he can get a little more creative, despite the big China obstacle.  However, I'm not sure that he's doing anything specificially wrong, though I'm perfectly willing to recognize as much if it turns out he is. It would be really, really nice to hear from Hamel what that might be, just for once. In the meantime, South Korea has long been my home and I would like it to be a society where the law make sense, where you can't get executed for what you think and where people with a common paternal ancestor 20 generations ago are allowed to marry, and I'm tired of seeing the hypocritical slander and disinformation used to convince the public that common sense reforms will "ruin the country," as Park Geun Hye alleges. 

I'd like to talk to MLS in a partking lot about NK human rights if the point is NK human rights, but I'm tired of seeing improvements in civil liberties in SK derailed in their name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Roh &amp; friends are doing terrible things, then stating what those things are should make the problems obvious enough. One should not have to exaggerate or accuse it of things that (1) it cannot help, like among many other things China&#8217;s behavior or (2) things that are what any SK government would do, even prior and Kim Dae Jung, or that can be understood in the context of SK culture, history, and politics. Note that on April 13, 1994 the Chosun Ilbo accused the government of not doing anything about NK defectors, &#8220;even though they have been an issue for a considerable amount of time.&#8221; Kindly remember that Kim Young Sam became president 1993. He was preceded by Roh Tae Woo, the former general. The GNP was the ruling and majority party under both Roh Tae Woo and Kim Young Sam, though several transformations &amp; name changes ago (the Democratic Liberal Party, then the New Korea Party). Charges coming from the GNP (or the GNP as a whole, anyway, since there are many healthy-thinking individuals among its ranks) that Roh Moo Hyun is doing the wrong thing or not doing enough about NK and defectors is politically motivated. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that Roh Moo Hyun can&#8217;t do more. Maybe he can, maybe he can get a little more creative, despite the big China obstacle.  However, I&#8217;m not sure that he&#8217;s doing anything specificially wrong, though I&#8217;m perfectly willing to recognize as much if it turns out he is. It would be really, really nice to hear from Hamel what that might be, just for once. In the meantime, South Korea has long been my home and I would like it to be a society where the law make sense, where you can&#8217;t get executed for what you think and where people with a common paternal ancestor 20 generations ago are allowed to marry, and I&#8217;m tired of seeing the hypocritical slander and disinformation used to convince the public that common sense reforms will &#8220;ruin the country,&#8221; as Park Geun Hye alleges. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to talk to MLS in a partking lot about NK human rights if the point is NK human rights, but I&#8217;m tired of seeing improvements in civil liberties in SK derailed in their name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLS</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8820</link>
		<dc:creator>MLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8820</guid>
		<description>Another Roh Regime Smear?  You bet and Good Job Brothers!!!  Keep up the smearing!
And Orankay. anytime you want to discuss North Korean Human Rights, I'll be glad to do it with you in the parking lot!  Come On Man! North Korea treats everything with violence or torture, so it will be Quid Pro Quo between you and I.

Regards,

Marc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Roh Regime Smear?  You bet and Good Job Brothers!!!  Keep up the smearing!<br />
And Orankay. anytime you want to discuss North Korean Human Rights, I&#8217;ll be glad to do it with you in the parking lot!  Come On Man! North Korea treats everything with violence or torture, so it will be Quid Pro Quo between you and I.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Marc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8819</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8819</guid>
		<description>I received an e-maill from Dr V this morning stating that he had been held at Pusan immigration for 10 (ten) hours. This morning a friend bumped into him at the Koreana hotel, where Dr V showed him the letter in English from the Korean government, asking him to avoid any activities that are inimical to the laws of Korea, or something to that affect.

This is the likely order of events, in my speculation:
What likely happened is:
1) Norbert turns up at Busan/Pusan
2) gets taken to a room for questioning
3) is asked to sign an undertaking
4) refuses
5) is left alone to think (at which point he calls my journalist friend)
6) the officers come back in and Dr V still refuses
7) something like this goes on for 10 hours
8) the officers, perhaps cognizant of the kind of stir Dr V could cause if denied entry to Korea and sent back to Japan, issue him a letter urging him to respect the laws of Korea and let him in with a warning.
8) Dr V enters Korea without signing the letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an e-maill from Dr V this morning stating that he had been held at Pusan immigration for 10 (ten) hours. This morning a friend bumped into him at the Koreana hotel, where Dr V showed him the letter in English from the Korean government, asking him to avoid any activities that are inimical to the laws of Korea, or something to that affect.</p>
<p>This is the likely order of events, in my speculation:<br />
What likely happened is:<br />
1) Norbert turns up at Busan/Pusan<br />
2) gets taken to a room for questioning<br />
3) is asked to sign an undertaking<br />
4) refuses<br />
5) is left alone to think (at which point he calls my journalist friend)<br />
6) the officers come back in and Dr V still refuses<br />
7) something like this goes on for 10 hours <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> the officers, perhaps cognizant of the kind of stir Dr V could cause if denied entry to Korea and sent back to Japan, issue him a letter urging him to respect the laws of Korea and let him in with a warning. <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Dr V enters Korea without signing the letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtual wonderer</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8818</link>
		<dc:creator>virtual wonderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8818</guid>
		<description>Ahh...  A typical response by the Noh Moo Hyun Regime.  Whereas they can rightfully claim that the NSL is an ancient relic ripe for retirement, they hypocritically silence foreign activists.  Then again this is the typical Noh Regime tactic, are any of us really surprised?

Someone wrote, "I?€™m angry at the old dictatorship types still in the GNP and right-wing movements for using him to legitimize their own political demands."
I have to agree 100%.  But I want to add, that I'm also angry with Korea's left for failing to support Vollertsen and taking violent stance against him and NK defectors resideing in SK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh&#8230;  A typical response by the Noh Moo Hyun Regime.  Whereas they can rightfully claim that the NSL is an ancient relic ripe for retirement, they hypocritically silence foreign activists.  Then again this is the typical Noh Regime tactic, are any of us really surprised?</p>
<p>Someone wrote, &#8220;I?€™m angry at the old dictatorship types still in the GNP and right-wing movements for using him to legitimize their own political demands.&#8221;<br />
I have to agree 100%.  But I want to add, that I&#8217;m also angry with Korea&#8217;s left for failing to support Vollertsen and taking violent stance against him and NK defectors resideing in SK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: non korean</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8817</link>
		<dc:creator>non korean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8817</guid>
		<description>Since North Korean communists are still the "enemy".  Is it fair to judge Dr. V the same way?  I mean one group is trying to "unify" Korea anyway possible including a war that killed millions of people.  While the other is genuinely interested in human rights, and to my knowledge not trying to bring the downfall of the Republic of Korea like the communists are.  How many times have union leaders or rice farmers said the same things about the current government?  

Also, hey if the GNP is pushing human rights in North Korea, good for them.  We all know Roh and URI proactively try to sweep it all under the carpet.  Sometimes a political "shift" occurs and for the past 5 or more years the GNP has been the party pushing human rights in North Korea.

I?€™m not the Marmot but I am pretty sure this story was not done just to smear the government and Roh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since North Korean communists are still the &#8220;enemy&#8221;.  Is it fair to judge Dr. V the same way?  I mean one group is trying to &#8220;unify&#8221; Korea anyway possible including a war that killed millions of people.  While the other is genuinely interested in human rights, and to my knowledge not trying to bring the downfall of the Republic of Korea like the communists are.  How many times have union leaders or rice farmers said the same things about the current government?  </p>
<p>Also, hey if the GNP is pushing human rights in North Korea, good for them.  We all know Roh and URI proactively try to sweep it all under the carpet.  Sometimes a political &#8220;shift&#8221; occurs and for the past 5 or more years the GNP has been the party pushing human rights in North Korea.</p>
<p>I?€™m not the Marmot but I am pretty sure this story was not done just to smear the government and Roh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>For those wanting to know the law applicable in this case, my source cites the ?¶œ??…??­?´€????²? 17?¡° ?€??™¸??­??¸ ????¹??™œ??™ ?¸??§€?·œ????€™(article 17 of the Immigration Law "regulations restricting political activities by foreigners".) You can find an English translation here: chapter 4, section 1 article 17 clause (2). I quote: "(2)An alien sojourning in the Republic of Korea shall not engage in political activities." 

To Kimbob: when I got the story at 5:30 this afternoon there was no print story yet - Dr V was still sitting in a room somewhere at Pusan harbour. Thanks to Marmot and Oranckay for both linking to a story with more details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those wanting to know the law applicable in this case, my source cites the ?¶œ??…??­?´€????²? 17?¡° ?€??™¸??­??¸ ????¹??™œ??™ ?¸??§€?·œ????€™(article 17 of the Immigration Law &#8220;regulations restricting political activities by foreigners&#8221;.) You can find an English translation here: chapter 4, section 1 article 17 clause (2). I quote: &#8220;(2)An alien sojourning in the Republic of Korea shall not engage in political activities.&#8221; </p>
<p>To Kimbob: when I got the story at 5:30 this afternoon there was no print story yet - Dr V was still sitting in a room somewhere at Pusan harbour. Thanks to Marmot and Oranckay for both linking to a story with more details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8815</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8815</guid>
		<description>Wow. I don't get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8814</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8814</guid>
		<description>Hmm.... 

Says here that the govt believes there was reason to deny him entry, but let him in anyway after giving him a "recommendation" (probably in written form) that he obey the ROK's laws.

Says the reason they let him in anyway was "out of consideration of the fact he is a human rights activist," but that it could take action against him should fail to obey the law in the future. Finally, it says that they tried to get him to sign papers saying he would obey the law, but that he refused. In other words, they're letting him in without signing anything. 

RE Hamel's : "At last count he was still there at the Immigration Office, and the officials said they would make their decision very soon as to what to do with him. Knowing Norbert, he would be highly unlikely to sign the statement, almost certainly guaranteeing his immediate deportation."

If the goal isn't to slander the govt at the slightest opprotunity, then I'm wondering if next time it wouldn't be worth counting to ten before posting. I think the nature of this post is at best irresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;. </p>
<p>Says here that the govt believes there was reason to deny him entry, but let him in anyway after giving him a &#8220;recommendation&#8221; (probably in written form) that he obey the ROK&#8217;s laws.</p>
<p>Says the reason they let him in anyway was &#8220;out of consideration of the fact he is a human rights activist,&#8221; but that it could take action against him should fail to obey the law in the future. Finally, it says that they tried to get him to sign papers saying he would obey the law, but that he refused. In other words, they&#8217;re letting him in without signing anything. </p>
<p>RE Hamel&#8217;s : &#8220;At last count he was still there at the Immigration Office, and the officials said they would make their decision very soon as to what to do with him. Knowing Norbert, he would be highly unlikely to sign the statement, almost certainly guaranteeing his immediate deportation.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the goal isn&#8217;t to slander the govt at the slightest opprotunity, then I&#8217;m wondering if next time it wouldn&#8217;t be worth counting to ten before posting. I think the nature of this post is at best irresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/29/the-norbert-conundrum/#comment-8813</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1288#comment-8813</guid>
		<description>While perhaps a technical difference, he wasn't deported, he wasn't permitted (re-entry) into the country, and many countries do that much all the time. Anyway...

Given the things he has said and the things he has done, I have long wondered why the government let him stay around so long, either by denying him re-entry like it did in Busan or by detaining and deporting him. The only reason I can think of that it didn't all this time is because it is scared of being accused of things. Frankly, if a communist or pro-North type had been telling people to rush the system like he did it might have meant jail time then deportation. Don't get me wrong, I do wish it let him back in, but as these cases go his is as clear cut as they come, wrong as they may be. 

I'm angry at the old dictatorship types still in the GNP and right-wing movements for using him to legitimize their own political demands. Or, if he really knew what they're all about, then the tragedy is that he let a righteous cause be co-opted by people who in 50 years in power never shows the slightest interest in human rights and still want to have laws that denied those rights around. Sadly - and this is an issue entirely separate from his re-entry denial - his face on Korean TV came to be a symbol of the desperate movement to keep Korea in the eighties and before. Ten years from now the things his friends are fighting will all be taken for granted as a matter of course for a mature democracy, and well look back at the history books and see pictures of The Good Doctor on the wrong side. 

I only got to meet him once and he is indeed as likeable as they say. I wish him the best and expect that he'll probably keep up with the same work.

I might mention that I, too, could have been deported many times over for political activities, especially during my student days, but that didn't happen. I've often wondered why. I mean, even now in Seoul I meet people from my school who I never knew but remember me as "politically active," so if any of the authorities had ever cared I guess I could've been in trouble. Probably I didn't because I was never a prominent leader, most of the time never made that much a difference doing anything, and many people close to me were doing so much more. If doing anything about me was ever contemplated (and I doubt it) then maybe someone figured students would be students and indeed, I learned a lot about Korea than I ever would've in a classroom. 

Just to clarify - I think that the government is only being consistent by denying him entry and like I say his case is as clear cut as they come given what he's been up to, but I still think it shouldn't have and think it would be worth protesting the action against him, as I expect no small number of politicians to do tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While perhaps a technical difference, he wasn&#8217;t deported, he wasn&#8217;t permitted (re-entry) into the country, and many countries do that much all the time. Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>Given the things he has said and the things he has done, I have long wondered why the government let him stay around so long, either by denying him re-entry like it did in Busan or by detaining and deporting him. The only reason I can think of that it didn&#8217;t all this time is because it is scared of being accused of things. Frankly, if a communist or pro-North type had been telling people to rush the system like he did it might have meant jail time then deportation. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I do wish it let him back in, but as these cases go his is as clear cut as they come, wrong as they may be. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m angry at the old dictatorship types still in the GNP and right-wing movements for using him to legitimize their own political demands. Or, if he really knew what they&#8217;re all about, then the tragedy is that he let a righteous cause be co-opted by people who in 50 years in power never shows the slightest interest in human rights and still want to have laws that denied those rights around. Sadly - and this is an issue entirely separate from his re-entry denial - his face on Korean TV came to be a symbol of the desperate movement to keep Korea in the eighties and before. Ten years from now the things his friends are fighting will all be taken for granted as a matter of course for a mature democracy, and well look back at the history books and see pictures of The Good Doctor on the wrong side. </p>
<p>I only got to meet him once and he is indeed as likeable as they say. I wish him the best and expect that he&#8217;ll probably keep up with the same work.</p>
<p>I might mention that I, too, could have been deported many times over for political activities, especially during my student days, but that didn&#8217;t happen. I&#8217;ve often wondered why. I mean, even now in Seoul I meet people from my school who I never knew but remember me as &#8220;politically active,&#8221; so if any of the authorities had ever cared I guess I could&#8217;ve been in trouble. Probably I didn&#8217;t because I was never a prominent leader, most of the time never made that much a difference doing anything, and many people close to me were doing so much more. If doing anything about me was ever contemplated (and I doubt it) then maybe someone figured students would be students and indeed, I learned a lot about Korea than I ever would&#8217;ve in a classroom. </p>
<p>Just to clarify - I think that the government is only being consistent by denying him entry and like I say his case is as clear cut as they come given what he&#8217;s been up to, but I still think it shouldn&#8217;t have and think it would be worth protesting the action against him, as I expect no small number of politicians to do tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
