<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20% of S. Koreans say Seoul should align with Pyongyang in Clash with U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 18:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nodong</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8375</link>
		<dc:creator>nodong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8375</guid>
		<description>?€?Long allied with U.S., S. Korea now looks to China?€™

Going back to old master.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>?€?Long allied with U.S., S. Korea now looks to China?€™</p>
<p>Going back to old master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curzon</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8374</link>
		<dc:creator>Curzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8374</guid>
		<description>That's not as worrying as it sounds -- 30% of Americans believe the Nazi holocaust never happened,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not as worrying as it sounds &#8212; 30% of Americans believe the Nazi holocaust never happened,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wooj</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8373</link>
		<dc:creator>wooj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8373</guid>
		<description>WOW!! 20% OF KOREANS ARE DUMB! But hey, here's another really interesting poll!

70% believe Saddam, 9-11 link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!! 20% OF KOREANS ARE DUMB! But hey, here&#8217;s another really interesting poll!</p>
<p>70% believe Saddam, 9-11 link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flying Yangban</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>Flying Yangban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>'Long allied with U.S., S. Korea now looks to China'
The problem with talking is that people sometimes listen. When folks in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota read their morning paper yesterday, this is the headline which greeted them: 'Long allied with U.S., S. Korea now looks to China'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Long allied with U.S., S. Korea now looks to China&#8217;<br />
The problem with talking is that people sometimes listen. When folks in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota read their morning paper yesterday, this is the headline which greeted them: &#8216;Long allied with U.S., S. Korea now looks to China&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lirelou</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8371</link>
		<dc:creator>lirelou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8371</guid>
		<description>Paul H. Thanks for the tip on the Sand Pebbles, Sad to acknowledge, I only saw the movie, but was quite impressed. Like Schoendorfer's "Le Crabbe Tambour", (on the Indochina riverine war) you almost have to know a little of the history to understand the nuances, but I believe that the "Sand Pebbles" captured them more successfully for a wider general audience. 

If you want to try a non-US vision of the Korean War, try Larteguy's "Les Mercenaires", originally published as "Sang sur la coline".

Kimbob. Good points on the Chosun dynasty and today's pacifist mood. I would point out that the quality of the ROK army in Vietnam spoke for itself. Unlike American units, which arrived well-trained and then degenerated due to many factors, with the individual replacement system being a major one, the two Korean divisions and Marine Brigade maintained their edge. U.S. commanders often derided the ROK forces as "inflexible and unimaginative", but in my former sector, after a year of trying to clear the NVA out of a zone using "flexible and imaginative" tactics (with admittedly inferior forces), they had to turn to the 9th ROK Division. The White Horse cleared the "Dong Bo" using a tried and true "by the book" approach in a matter of days. Small wonder that after the war, the U.S. Army went back to relearning its doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul H. Thanks for the tip on the Sand Pebbles, Sad to acknowledge, I only saw the movie, but was quite impressed. Like Schoendorfer&#8217;s &#8220;Le Crabbe Tambour&#8221;, (on the Indochina riverine war) you almost have to know a little of the history to understand the nuances, but I believe that the &#8220;Sand Pebbles&#8221; captured them more successfully for a wider general audience. </p>
<p>If you want to try a non-US vision of the Korean War, try Larteguy&#8217;s &#8220;Les Mercenaires&#8221;, originally published as &#8220;Sang sur la coline&#8221;.</p>
<p>Kimbob. Good points on the Chosun dynasty and today&#8217;s pacifist mood. I would point out that the quality of the ROK army in Vietnam spoke for itself. Unlike American units, which arrived well-trained and then degenerated due to many factors, with the individual replacement system being a major one, the two Korean divisions and Marine Brigade maintained their edge. U.S. commanders often derided the ROK forces as &#8220;inflexible and unimaginative&#8221;, but in my former sector, after a year of trying to clear the NVA out of a zone using &#8220;flexible and imaginative&#8221; tactics (with admittedly inferior forces), they had to turn to the 9th ROK Division. The White Horse cleared the &#8220;Dong Bo&#8221; using a tried and true &#8220;by the book&#8221; approach in a matter of days. Small wonder that after the war, the U.S. Army went back to relearning its doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H.</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8370</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8370</guid>
		<description>Lirelou &#38; others interested in military history:  you might enjoy reading "The Sand Pebbles" (if you haven't already -- the novel is far superior to the movie IMO and it's been so long since it came out that it may be unread by many now).  I think it won a national book award in the early 60's and was a bestseller, so lots of used copies around.  

The author had been a sailor on the US river gunboats in China of the 20's, and was a great observer.  A fascinating portrayal in there about how the Chinese learn Western military techniques &#38; political nationalism from the resident Western powers, and turn it against them to expel them from the interior of China.  The author brings in on the incipient conflict between the Communists and the Nationalists as well. 

I mention it here as I am reminded of it by the discussion of the Sino-Japanese war above.  Korean culture of the time was probably similar to the Chinese, in that nationalism in the Western sense (and in the sense it exists in both Koreas today) was not a dominant factor then, until the rise of the Kuomintang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lirelou &amp; others interested in military history:  you might enjoy reading &#8220;The Sand Pebbles&#8221; (if you haven&#8217;t already &#8212; the novel is far superior to the movie IMO and it&#8217;s been so long since it came out that it may be unread by many now).  I think it won a national book award in the early 60&#8217;s and was a bestseller, so lots of used copies around.  </p>
<p>The author had been a sailor on the US river gunboats in China of the 20&#8217;s, and was a great observer.  A fascinating portrayal in there about how the Chinese learn Western military techniques &amp; political nationalism from the resident Western powers, and turn it against them to expel them from the interior of China.  The author brings in on the incipient conflict between the Communists and the Nationalists as well. </p>
<p>I mention it here as I am reminded of it by the discussion of the Sino-Japanese war above.  Korean culture of the time was probably similar to the Chinese, in that nationalism in the Western sense (and in the sense it exists in both Koreas today) was not a dominant factor then, until the rise of the Kuomintang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimbob</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8369</link>
		<dc:creator>kimbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8369</guid>
		<description>Actually this was bedjan's writing:

?€œeffeminate?€? and ?€œcowardly?€?.  Hamel might have said "cowardly", but I think Bedjan threw in the "effeminate"  part in there as an extra effect. If he's right and Koreans are genetically effiminate and genetically prone to be cowardly then we have nothing to worry about the North Koreans. They'll just be all softies with homosexual tendencies with pink handkerchiefs who can't possibly fight. Yes, that must be it. So I just don't understand how those same cowardly homos can take over the entire S.Korea when we have 30,000 brave American "real men" standing in their way. Before someone flame again, I am just being sarcastic. So take it with a grain of salt.

No arguments here that Militarism has never been the culture of the Chosun dynasty, that is no secrecy. It was systematic that the military was always weak.  Confuscianism made sure that the lowest common denominators were the soldiers. Many of the foot soldiers were actually conscripted slaves who were basically used as fodder - abused, ill fed, ill equipped, ill-led, and ill trained. The top most hierarchy during the Chosun dynasty were the Yangban scholars who were the commanders . Fighting in wars weren't actually their fortes. The Chosun dynasty were never really interested in having a strong modern military as far as I could see. That was part of their downfall when Japan colonized Korea in 1905. Chosun looked upon China as the great originator of culture, and thus looked upon China as a military guarantor as well. The problem was, China was going down the tubes. Choson utterly depended upon China that they never saw how far they were being outstripped technologically by Japan who opened up their economy to the West.  That dependence on a bigger foreign power in certain ways, is no different from today, when S.Korea looks upon the US as the great originator of culture, and also a military guarantor of S.Korea.

There is a mood of pacifism sweeping Korea at this current moment. Koreans are tired of 50 years of division and conflict with North Korea, and thus explains the wishful thinkings we see today. I just wish people don't forget the lessons of Chosun dynasty, and the Korean war, when Korea's military was woefully ill prepared. If you want to keep peace and freedom, you need a strong military to fight for it and defend it. That is the hard lesson that many Koreans are forgetting already. It is frustrating to see that learning from history and past mistakes is not taught in the public and in the schools.  The text books, even the TV dramas of Chosun dynasty only idolizes all portray a fantasy.  The truth was that the Chosun Korea was a horrid, primitive, and a stumped culture with very little advances in anything. It's as if time stopped in Choson Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually this was bedjan&#8217;s writing:</p>
<p>?€œeffeminate?€? and ?€œcowardly?€?.  Hamel might have said &#8220;cowardly&#8221;, but I think Bedjan threw in the &#8220;effeminate&#8221;  part in there as an extra effect. If he&#8217;s right and Koreans are genetically effiminate and genetically prone to be cowardly then we have nothing to worry about the North Koreans. They&#8217;ll just be all softies with homosexual tendencies with pink handkerchiefs who can&#8217;t possibly fight. Yes, that must be it. So I just don&#8217;t understand how those same cowardly homos can take over the entire S.Korea when we have 30,000 brave American &#8220;real men&#8221; standing in their way. Before someone flame again, I am just being sarcastic. So take it with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>No arguments here that Militarism has never been the culture of the Chosun dynasty, that is no secrecy. It was systematic that the military was always weak.  Confuscianism made sure that the lowest common denominators were the soldiers. Many of the foot soldiers were actually conscripted slaves who were basically used as fodder - abused, ill fed, ill equipped, ill-led, and ill trained. The top most hierarchy during the Chosun dynasty were the Yangban scholars who were the commanders . Fighting in wars weren&#8217;t actually their fortes. The Chosun dynasty were never really interested in having a strong modern military as far as I could see. That was part of their downfall when Japan colonized Korea in 1905. Chosun looked upon China as the great originator of culture, and thus looked upon China as a military guarantor as well. The problem was, China was going down the tubes. Choson utterly depended upon China that they never saw how far they were being outstripped technologically by Japan who opened up their economy to the West.  That dependence on a bigger foreign power in certain ways, is no different from today, when S.Korea looks upon the US as the great originator of culture, and also a military guarantor of S.Korea.</p>
<p>There is a mood of pacifism sweeping Korea at this current moment. Koreans are tired of 50 years of division and conflict with North Korea, and thus explains the wishful thinkings we see today. I just wish people don&#8217;t forget the lessons of Chosun dynasty, and the Korean war, when Korea&#8217;s military was woefully ill prepared. If you want to keep peace and freedom, you need a strong military to fight for it and defend it. That is the hard lesson that many Koreans are forgetting already. It is frustrating to see that learning from history and past mistakes is not taught in the public and in the schools.  The text books, even the TV dramas of Chosun dynasty only idolizes all portray a fantasy.  The truth was that the Chosun Korea was a horrid, primitive, and a stumped culture with very little advances in anything. It&#8217;s as if time stopped in Choson Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8368</guid>
		<description>Actually those were Hamel's words Kimbob. Here's the English translation of the original Dutch. Whether or not Hamel's account is accurate is of course circumspect.

"On the other hand the Koreans are very gullible. We could fool them with anything. This was particularly true for the monks, who liked to listen to stories about foreign countries and their people. Furthermore they are very cowardly, as it seemed what we have heard from reliable people concerning their behavior during the Japanese invasion, when their king was killed and a great number of cities and villages were destroyed. From Jan Janse Weltevree we heard that when the Tartarians(Manchu/Qing) came over the ice and occupied the country, more soldiers hanged themselves in the wood, than had been killed during the battle against the invaders."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually those were Hamel&#8217;s words Kimbob. Here&#8217;s the English translation of the original Dutch. Whether or not Hamel&#8217;s account is accurate is of course circumspect.</p>
<p>&#8220;On the other hand the Koreans are very gullible. We could fool them with anything. This was particularly true for the monks, who liked to listen to stories about foreign countries and their people. Furthermore they are very cowardly, as it seemed what we have heard from reliable people concerning their behavior during the Japanese invasion, when their king was killed and a great number of cities and villages were destroyed. From Jan Janse Weltevree we heard that when the Tartarians(Manchu/Qing) came over the ice and occupied the country, more soldiers hanged themselves in the wood, than had been killed during the battle against the invaders.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lirelou</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator>lirelou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8367</guid>
		<description>Small comment on the "3000 Japanese" troops. I suspect that the actual numbers would depend upon a specific time period. Frankly, the numerous sources I've read off the internet have confused me. Kimsoft does a good job (yech, puke, I actually said that) posting a large amount of historical material (which he either makes no attempt to deconflict, misquotes, or simply discards) on his internet site. Running mostly through various western accounts, I get the impression that Japan landed somewhere near 15,000 troops in Korea between 1894 and 1895, but that after their defeat of the Tonghaks, the Righteous Army, and the Chinese under Yuan Shikai, they reduced their strength in Korea to "six and a half battalions". That is a relatively small force in terms of numbers (possibly numbering between 4,000 and 7,000 troops). But this must be put within the context of the times: 1 - Japan was a modern Army. 2 - It had just defeated the Chinese (perhaps as great a victory as a modern defeat of the USA in 1890 Korean eyes???), and 3 - it had an ever modernizing Navy which could quickly move additional troops to Korea. Likewise, the Korea of the period was a rigidly confucian kingdom, with the mental attitudes that this implies. I suspect that fighting was considered a soldier's duty, not the common people's. (And, they had defeated the closest thing Korea had to a "people's army" at that time, the Tong Haks.) Old Hong Bom Do was a tiger hunter in civilian live, and obviously trained in the use of firearms, but the majority of his fellow Korean commoners probably considered expelling the Japanese the government's, more particularly the Army's, job. Thus a tendency to wait events out, rather than take up arms. Bottom line: whatever the real numbers were (any Japanese-reading imperial army historians out there who can answer that?), they have to be placed within the context of their times, and the organization, training, and equipment of the various forces must be properly considered.

Aside for nulji: We all have assholes, and the more we post on the blogsphere, the easier it is to see. (to paraphrase Creighton Abrams)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small comment on the &#8220;3000 Japanese&#8221; troops. I suspect that the actual numbers would depend upon a specific time period. Frankly, the numerous sources I&#8217;ve read off the internet have confused me. Kimsoft does a good job (yech, puke, I actually said that) posting a large amount of historical material (which he either makes no attempt to deconflict, misquotes, or simply discards) on his internet site. Running mostly through various western accounts, I get the impression that Japan landed somewhere near 15,000 troops in Korea between 1894 and 1895, but that after their defeat of the Tonghaks, the Righteous Army, and the Chinese under Yuan Shikai, they reduced their strength in Korea to &#8220;six and a half battalions&#8221;. That is a relatively small force in terms of numbers (possibly numbering between 4,000 and 7,000 troops). But this must be put within the context of the times: 1 - Japan was a modern Army. 2 - It had just defeated the Chinese (perhaps as great a victory as a modern defeat of the USA in 1890 Korean eyes???), and 3 - it had an ever modernizing Navy which could quickly move additional troops to Korea. Likewise, the Korea of the period was a rigidly confucian kingdom, with the mental attitudes that this implies. I suspect that fighting was considered a soldier&#8217;s duty, not the common people&#8217;s. (And, they had defeated the closest thing Korea had to a &#8220;people&#8217;s army&#8221; at that time, the Tong Haks.) Old Hong Bom Do was a tiger hunter in civilian live, and obviously trained in the use of firearms, but the majority of his fellow Korean commoners probably considered expelling the Japanese the government&#8217;s, more particularly the Army&#8217;s, job. Thus a tendency to wait events out, rather than take up arms. Bottom line: whatever the real numbers were (any Japanese-reading imperial army historians out there who can answer that?), they have to be placed within the context of their times, and the organization, training, and equipment of the various forces must be properly considered.</p>
<p>Aside for nulji: We all have assholes, and the more we post on the blogsphere, the easier it is to see. (to paraphrase Creighton Abrams)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nulji maripkan</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/11/16/20-of-s-koreans-say-seoul-should-align-with-pyongyang-in-clash-with-us/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>nulji maripkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1256#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>i can distinguish that you're usually supportive of sk, kimbob. i also can
tell you're an asshole!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can distinguish that you&#8217;re usually supportive of sk, kimbob. i also can<br />
tell you&#8217;re an asshole!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
