<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuseok photos to remember</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  7 Sep 2008 23:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lesbian preggo</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6846</link>
		<dc:creator>lesbian preggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6846</guid>
		<description>My kung fu is stronger than your kung fu.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My kung fu is stronger than your kung fu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yen jun</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6845</link>
		<dc:creator>yen jun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6845</guid>
		<description>Many personalities are surgically-assisted.

 Note Catherine Zeta-Jones (`a legend in her own mind', sniped a British writer) whose lips have gone from thin in Mask of Zorro to pouty in Intolerable Cruelty.

  American/Australian rags have run picture spreads of stars like Halle Berry and Nicole Kidman, who've transformed themselves from goodlooking women into goddesses.

   Miss Nigeria,who won Miss World 2000, is truly ravishing.

   Everybody is beautiful. (I take that back. It sounds so...MICHAEL JACKSON)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many personalities are surgically-assisted.</p>
<p> Note Catherine Zeta-Jones (`a legend in her own mind&#8217;, sniped a British writer) whose lips have gone from thin in Mask of Zorro to pouty in Intolerable Cruelty.</p>
<p>  American/Australian rags have run picture spreads of stars like Halle Berry and Nicole Kidman, who&#8217;ve transformed themselves from goodlooking women into goddesses.</p>
<p>   Miss Nigeria,who won Miss World 2000, is truly ravishing.</p>
<p>   Everybody is beautiful. (I take that back. It sounds so&#8230;MICHAEL JACKSON)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Marmot</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>The Marmot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>Tony, it's her.  BTW, if you think she looks different in that pic, Hamel was able to track down some pics of her back from her days at DePaul.  Still a very pretty girl, regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, it&#8217;s her.  BTW, if you think she looks different in that pic, Hamel was able to track down some pics of her back from her days at DePaul.  Still a very pretty girl, regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeyore</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>eeyore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>Sorry to disagree with you Jing. I would take a woman in  a hanbok over a woman in a bikini any day. Maybe it is just me, but I find it more visually appealing than anything in Victoria's Secret.  All women look as good in handbok. Not always a ravishing beauty (considering ajumma and grandmas) but always uniquely stunning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to disagree with you Jing. I would take a woman in  a hanbok over a woman in a bikini any day. Maybe it is just me, but I find it more visually appealing than anything in Victoria&#8217;s Secret.  All women look as good in handbok. Not always a ravishing beauty (considering ajumma and grandmas) but always uniquely stunning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jing</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6842</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6842</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does anyone else find traditional women's clothing from east Asia generally a complete turn off? Kimonos look kind of ridiculous, especially the way they constrain a woman's legs. The Hanbok is perhaps even more unflattering to the female form. Only Chinese qipao dresses are the least bit sexy (thank god for the manchus) but even then, they aren't exactly traditional as the contemporary design of them (thin fitting, long slit up the legs) is from the early 20th century. The original Qipao were also long, but they were loose fitting and no slits, hence much like a rather conservative night gown. The pre-Qing era dresses were very similar to Hanbok, if not as boxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does anyone else find traditional women&#8217;s clothing from east Asia generally a complete turn off? Kimonos look kind of ridiculous, especially the way they constrain a woman&#8217;s legs. The Hanbok is perhaps even more unflattering to the female form. Only Chinese qipao dresses are the least bit sexy (thank god for the manchus) but even then, they aren&#8217;t exactly traditional as the contemporary design of them (thin fitting, long slit up the legs) is from the early 20th century. The original Qipao were also long, but they were loose fitting and no slits, hence much like a rather conservative night gown. The pre-Qing era dresses were very similar to Hanbok, if not as boxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6841</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6841</guid>
		<description>You know, she really looks different in the above picture.  Maybe I need stronger glasses, but doesn't her face look a bit different as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, she really looks different in the above picture.  Maybe I need stronger glasses, but doesn&#8217;t her face look a bit different as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/30/chuseok-photos-to-remember/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1108#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>It is entirely possible that some American ancestors are buried in Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is entirely possible that some American ancestors are buried in Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
