<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pueblo wants Pueblo back?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/02/pueblo-wants-pueblo-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/02/pueblo-wants-pueblo-back/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 19:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/02/pueblo-wants-pueblo-back/#comment-6064</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1059#comment-6064</guid>
		<description>Or perhaps a cutting out expedition (example at &lt;a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/docs/war1812/const2.htm)." rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.history.navy.mil/docs/war1812/const2.htm).&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or perhaps a cutting out expedition (example at <a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/docs/war1812/const2.htm)." rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/docs/war1812/const2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.history.navy.mil/do.....const2.htm</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zdunk</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/02/pueblo-wants-pueblo-back/#comment-6063</link>
		<dc:creator>Zdunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1059#comment-6063</guid>
		<description>I think an interesting, although highly unlikely, option for the American gov't during some tense moment in negotiations with N.K. would be this:  the obliteration and sinking of the docked Pueblo with cruise missiles.  With a subsequent and enigmatic "Hey, it's our boat we have the right to sink it" comment.  It would be an excellent slap at North Korea - too small to draw response, and symbolic enough to call into focus the US ability to obliterate the North, a fact often forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an interesting, although highly unlikely, option for the American gov&#8217;t during some tense moment in negotiations with N.K. would be this:  the obliteration and sinking of the docked Pueblo with cruise missiles.  With a subsequent and enigmatic &#8220;Hey, it&#8217;s our boat we have the right to sink it&#8221; comment.  It would be an excellent slap at North Korea - too small to draw response, and symbolic enough to call into focus the US ability to obliterate the North, a fact often forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranckay</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/09/02/pueblo-wants-pueblo-back/#comment-6062</link>
		<dc:creator>oranckay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 01:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=1059#comment-6062</guid>
		<description>Donald Gregg is currently head of the Korea Society, so despite his CIA background is probably in a better position than most to talk to the North about it. 

I myself would like to see the US include it in its list of demands during future negotiations. That way feed NK some of its own medicine. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Gregg is currently head of the Korea Society, so despite his CIA background is probably in a better position than most to talk to the North about it. </p>
<p>I myself would like to see the US include it in its list of demands during future negotiations. That way feed NK some of its own medicine. <img src='http://www.rjkoehler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
