Comments on: China backs off Koguryo?

By: korea4one

korea4one — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:39:16 +0000

Please define what is Chinese culture and Chinese race before Chinese nationalist argue about Korguyro Kingdoms. Korean History was formed by Ko-Chosun, Korguryo, Shilla, Paekje, Kaya Kingdoms ( Koryo, Chosun, modern day Korea). During three Korean Kingdoms. It was localized civilization that were populated by same group of people ” Puyo” The Puyo tribe orginated in Manchura and Korean Peninsula. Puyo tribe does not relate to Chinese. Chinese itself is mixed race and culture. Manchura and Korean Peninsula historical linkage is much too deep to celebrate itself from Chinese nationalist.

By: payday loans

payday loans — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:39:10 +0000

payday loans

In your free time, take a look at the pages about discover card cash advance personal loans

By: Magnus Persson

Magnus Persson — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:49:27 +0000

h hentai bondage examples pics

China backs off Koguryo?

By: s dt plls tv

s dt plls tv — Fri, 16 Sep 2005 05:49:16 +0000

s dt plls tv

In your free time, take a look at the pages dedicated to dt pll rvws

By: discover card

discover card — Sat, 10 Sep 2005 04:07:18 +0000

discover card

Please take a look at some relevant information dedicated to mortgage cash advance loans

By: D. Tang

D. Tang — Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:52:15 +0000

There was no concept of Korean people, Korean country at the time of Koguryo Kingdom. People of Koguryo Kingdom consisted of different tribes in Manchuria. They spoke the type of language different from the Korean
language of today but more related to Old Japanese. So modern day Koreans only inherit some culture,traditions from Koguryo they also inherit some culture from China too. It is natural to say the present day Dongbeiren can claim they have linkage to
Koguryo, because of the blood and because of the land they resided for thousands of years, e.g. the Manchu people who also regard Baktau Mountain is also their sacred place where their ancesters lived. Buyeo, Koguryo people were only part of the ethnic tribes that reside in Manchuria.
Koreans are only existed when the three countries unified for the firt time in the Korean penisula.

My point of view is Koguryo has historical impacts both to present day China and present day Korea.

By: KOGURYO

KOGURYO — Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:27:06 +0000

Koguryo belongs to Korea. Their capital was located in Pyongyang. Their descendants established post-Koguryo during the last years of the Shinla unified peninsula. Post-Koguryo suceeded in defeating Post-Parhae and Shinla to create the newly unified kingdom of Koryo, which is the abbreviated name for Koguryo, under Wang-Gun. It is from Koryo that westerners refer to “Korea”. Koguryo-Koryo-Korea. It doesnt get any simpler then that. Koguryo is not Chinese because the Chinese civilization developed from the Yellow River. Koguryo was a manchurian state, unfortunately currently occupied by the Han Chinese. Is it safe to say that the Aboriginals of America are Anglo-Americans because they occupy the land? I dont think so. and neither should Koguryo be mis-represented in the same manner.

By: Michael

Michael — Tue, 07 Sep 2004 06:35:55 +0000

I would think there is good overlapping claims by both China and Korea to the history of Korguryo. I feel it’s is not helpful if one insists it’s the sole owner of Korguryo History. Why don’t both of the affected countries sit together and let the academics on both sides discuss it in a cool headed way. It should not be politicised since it is more an academic issues, and no reason why it can not be settled amicably.

From a concerned outside observer.

By: Wo Bu Zhidao

Wo Bu Zhidao — Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:56:51 +0000

?º”??³?±±
Recently there has been a little bit of controversy over the ancient kingdom of Koguryo. This controversy has even caused the censorship of the Chinese version of a Korean newspaper in China. The newspaper will get no sympathy from me,

By: Rhesus

Rhesus — Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:51:07 +0000

garymooreblues:

“Snubbing the gathered representatives of the 15 nations who saved your ass from utter destruction when you only live ten minutes away is not ?€œirritating”, it?€™s unforgivable.”
__________________

It may not be possible to forgive President Roh. Be that as it may, taking his actions as reflections of an entire country’s sentiment is, again, misguided. Moreover, there’s a big difference between reasoned criticism of the ROK and wishing for a Chinese invasion of North Korea.