<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hack the dragon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amphetamine Diet Pills</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5057</link>
		<dc:creator>Amphetamine Diet Pills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5057</guid>
		<description>Amphetamine Diet Pills

You can also check some helpful info on stackers II diet pills
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amphetamine Diet Pills</p>
<p>You can also check some helpful info on stackers II diet pills</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lns</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5056</link>
		<dc:creator>lns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5056</guid>
		<description>lns

You are invited to check out the sites dedicated to dscvr crd csh dvnc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lns</p>
<p>You are invited to check out the sites dedicated to dscvr crd csh dvnc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgr ntrctv ln</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5055</link>
		<dc:creator>jgr ntrctv ln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 02:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5055</guid>
		<description>jgr ntrctv ln

Take your time to check some relevant pages on jgr sgr prtl wb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jgr ntrctv ln</p>
<p>Take your time to check some relevant pages on jgr sgr prtl wb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flower power</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5054</link>
		<dc:creator>flower power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5054</guid>
		<description>flower power

You may find it interesting to check out the sites dedicated to peony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flower power</p>
<p>You may find it interesting to check out the sites dedicated to peony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: effective diet pill</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5053</link>
		<dc:creator>effective diet pill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5053</guid>
		<description>effective diet pill

You may find it interesting to visit the sites dedicated to yellow jackets diet pills</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>effective diet pill</p>
<p>You may find it interesting to visit the sites dedicated to yellow jackets diet pills</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Txs Hldm Pkr</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5052</link>
		<dc:creator>Txs Hldm Pkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5052</guid>
		<description>Txs Hldm Pkr

Please check some relevant information on txs hldm trnmnt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Txs Hldm Pkr</p>
<p>Please check some relevant information on txs hldm trnmnt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plvx</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5051</link>
		<dc:creator>plvx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5051</guid>
		<description>You may find it interesting to check out the pages in the field of wmns hlth 
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may find it interesting to check out the pages in the field of wmns hlth<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AS</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5050</link>
		<dc:creator>AS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5050</guid>
		<description>saaSas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saaSas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balkan Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5049</link>
		<dc:creator>Balkan Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5049</guid>
		<description>First of all, Sir Notsoslim, did you know that the 80 or so Koguryo words found as toponyms conclude there is no linguistic family affiliation between Modern Korean and Koguryo? If anything, Koguryo was only a dialect. And, yes, these toponyms, based on the pronunciation by chinese characters prove the lexical similarities with Old Japanese. So what is your point?
Modern and Middle Korean ( I am sure you know this) have gone through alot of changes. Replacement of Korean native words from Chinese loan words happened on a continual basis since the three kingdom periods of KOREA. 

FYO, there are plenty of cognates between Turkish,Mongolian, Tungusic/Manchu, Korean, and Japanese,,,,,,,,,,, IF you want information on those cognates, I will direct you to those websites......

I am assuming you have limited knowledge of these Macro Altaic Language family......

ps. Why have you not mentioned the Yaemek people of Korea, who spoke a dialect very close to Koguryo people,,,,,,

Let me remind you, NOTSOSLIM, being a multi-lingual person,,,,,,,,,Korean history, identity, and culture evolves around the three kingdoms of Koguryo,Paekchae, and Silla. All these kingdoms form a three piece puzzle to make a whole Korea. That puzzle piece never fit the nation of China, nor will it ever will. 

Perhaps it is also necessary to research and study China's internal struggle of suppressing their own minorities and the search of its own identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Sir Notsoslim, did you know that the 80 or so Koguryo words found as toponyms conclude there is no linguistic family affiliation between Modern Korean and Koguryo? If anything, Koguryo was only a dialect. And, yes, these toponyms, based on the pronunciation by chinese characters prove the lexical similarities with Old Japanese. So what is your point?<br />
Modern and Middle Korean ( I am sure you know this) have gone through alot of changes. Replacement of Korean native words from Chinese loan words happened on a continual basis since the three kingdom periods of KOREA. </p>
<p>FYO, there are plenty of cognates between Turkish,Mongolian, Tungusic/Manchu, Korean, and Japanese,,,,,,,,,,, IF you want information on those cognates, I will direct you to those websites&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I am assuming you have limited knowledge of these Macro Altaic Language family&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>ps. Why have you not mentioned the Yaemek people of Korea, who spoke a dialect very close to Koguryo people,,,,,,</p>
<p>Let me remind you, NOTSOSLIM, being a multi-lingual person,,,,,,,,,Korean history, identity, and culture evolves around the three kingdoms of Koguryo,Paekchae, and Silla. All these kingdoms form a three piece puzzle to make a whole Korea. That puzzle piece never fit the nation of China, nor will it ever will. </p>
<p>Perhaps it is also necessary to research and study China&#8217;s internal struggle of suppressing their own minorities and the search of its own identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephemeral</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/07/28/hack-the-dragon/#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephemeral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 08:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=982#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>Maybe all of you would like to think on how and why Chinese government lately have changed or whitewashed part of their ancient texts records that is acknowledging Koguryo  as a separate kingdom with their own culture.  

Now..I've seen some rather hilarious comments up there...Truth is, the identity of Koguryo IS related to Current Korea for one of the countless reasons that you people "forgot". After unified Silla, the Koryo dynasty succeeds over the Korean Peninsula. The name Koryo directly comes from kingdom Koguryo and there are tons of historical evidence about that. This and more tells that our pre-ancestors even recognised Koguryo as our("their" at that time), (Koryo = Korean) ancestors. Let alone the fact that they have succeeded Koguryo's own cultures, etc 
Now, I'm pretty sure you've heard where the word and term "Korea" comes from before. 

Also the historical evidence about the existence of non-Chinese people in Manchuria 
until the elimintion of Puyo, Koguryo,and Parhae, let alone the Xienbi, Khitan, Jurchen, Turks 
and Mongols shows that the Chinese did not have an easy time with that region. This tells you that Manchuria region did not belong to Chinese. 
Also if you didn't know, till September 1909 Gando, most of North east Manchuria (Still is) belonged to Chosun Dynasty till Japanese and Chinese had their own treaty without Chosun to trade Manchuria. (If you want to see the proof of this have a look at French Du Halde?·1740 map, R.de Vaugondy?·1750 map, and English Wilkinson?·1794 map.) 

Of course no one's saying that here...but the thing is, Chinese is. And what gets me most is that by arguing with a prejudice that Koguryo and its culture is not current Korean with "that's-possible-doubt", you people are no different to what Chinese government is doing and by doing so, you people are actually supporting China's East Asian project.  

The language they spoke, (Historical evidence shows that people of Koguryo, Silla and Baekjae did not have difficulty in terms of communicating due to language barrier...), the food they had (People of Koguryo were masters at the fermentated foods...which Koreans are good at too),and the clothings, and the rituals and so on they had has been evolved and the current Koreans are the only "race" that have succeeded its evolved, concorded, yet original culture.   
If that's not the Korea's real identity, then I don't know what is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe all of you would like to think on how and why Chinese government lately have changed or whitewashed part of their ancient texts records that is acknowledging Koguryo  as a separate kingdom with their own culture.  </p>
<p>Now..I&#8217;ve seen some rather hilarious comments up there&#8230;Truth is, the identity of Koguryo IS related to Current Korea for one of the countless reasons that you people &#8220;forgot&#8221;. After unified Silla, the Koryo dynasty succeeds over the Korean Peninsula. The name Koryo directly comes from kingdom Koguryo and there are tons of historical evidence about that. This and more tells that our pre-ancestors even recognised Koguryo as our(&#8221;their&#8221; at that time), (Koryo = Korean) ancestors. Let alone the fact that they have succeeded Koguryo&#8217;s own cultures, etc<br />
Now, I&#8217;m pretty sure you&#8217;ve heard where the word and term &#8220;Korea&#8221; comes from before. </p>
<p>Also the historical evidence about the existence of non-Chinese people in Manchuria<br />
until the elimintion of Puyo, Koguryo,and Parhae, let alone the Xienbi, Khitan, Jurchen, Turks<br />
and Mongols shows that the Chinese did not have an easy time with that region. This tells you that Manchuria region did not belong to Chinese.<br />
Also if you didn&#8217;t know, till September 1909 Gando, most of North east Manchuria (Still is) belonged to Chosun Dynasty till Japanese and Chinese had their own treaty without Chosun to trade Manchuria. (If you want to see the proof of this have a look at French Du Halde?·1740 map, R.de Vaugondy?·1750 map, and English Wilkinson?·1794 map.) </p>
<p>Of course no one&#8217;s saying that here&#8230;but the thing is, Chinese is. And what gets me most is that by arguing with a prejudice that Koguryo and its culture is not current Korean with &#8220;that&#8217;s-possible-doubt&#8221;, you people are no different to what Chinese government is doing and by doing so, you people are actually supporting China&#8217;s East Asian project.  </p>
<p>The language they spoke, (Historical evidence shows that people of Koguryo, Silla and Baekjae did not have difficulty in terms of communicating due to language barrier&#8230;), the food they had (People of Koguryo were masters at the fermentated foods&#8230;which Koreans are good at too),and the clothings, and the rituals and so on they had has been evolved and the current Koreans are the only &#8220;race&#8221; that have succeeded its evolved, concorded, yet original culture.<br />
If that&#8217;s not the Korea&#8217;s real identity, then I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
