Comments on: Thanks for the help http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/05/15/thanks-for-the-help/ Korea... in Blog Format Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:47:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Won Joon Choe http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/05/15/thanks-for-the-help/#comment-3575 Won Joon Choe Sun, 16 May 2004 09:28:51 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=795#comment-3575 WJK, The Marshall court did not turn against the Jefferson administration in Marbury v. Madison. It actually ruled in favor of Jefferson's administration. Marmot, You are the Chosunilbo translator? Interesting. I will keep that in mind when I see mistranslations in the future :) WJK,

The Marshall court did not turn against the Jefferson administration in Marbury v. Madison. It actually ruled in favor of Jefferson’s administration.

Marmot,

You are the Chosunilbo translator? Interesting. I will keep that in mind when I see mistranslations in the future :)

]]> By: Zdunk http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/05/15/thanks-for-the-help/#comment-3574 Zdunk Sat, 15 May 2004 18:32:41 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=795#comment-3574 Ahoy! If you're running the pirate ship 'Emule' or 'Edonkey', you can get that expansion pack for free at Shareconnector... Arrrr! Ahoy! If you’re running the pirate ship ‘Emule’ or ‘Edonkey’, you can get that expansion pack for free at Shareconnector…

Arrrr!

]]> By: WJK http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/05/15/thanks-for-the-help/#comment-3573 WJK Sat, 15 May 2004 15:52:14 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=795#comment-3573 What was it in the US, Marbury vs Madison? That is not possible in South Korea. The courts will never turn against the President. Something to improve on. What was it in the US, Marbury vs Madison? That is not possible in South Korea. The courts will never turn against the President. Something to improve on.

]]> By: WJK http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/05/15/thanks-for-the-help/#comment-3572 WJK Sat, 15 May 2004 15:24:38 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=795#comment-3572 Something interesting I realized as I read my Korean newspaper in New York City. The Supreme court of South Korea is set up to do favors for the administration. There are 9 judges in the South Korean Supreme Court. 5 of them were named to their posts in the Year 2000. 1 in the Year 1999. 1 in the Year 2001. 1 in the Year 2003. 1 in the Year 2004. This means Roh already had a majority of judges who share political views with Kim Dae Jung, and 1 who got named to the post while he was President. Very different from America, where Supreme court justices serve till they DIE. Something interesting I realized as I read my Korean newspaper in New York City. The Supreme court of South Korea is set up to do favors for the administration.

There are 9 judges in the South Korean Supreme Court.

5 of them were named to their posts in the Year 2000.

1 in the Year 1999.

1 in the Year 2001.

1 in the Year 2003.

1 in the Year 2004.

This means Roh already had a majority of judges who share political views with Kim Dae Jung, and 1 who got named to the post while he was President.

Very different from America, where Supreme court justices serve till they DIE.

]]> By: oranckay http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/05/15/thanks-for-the-help/#comment-3571 oranckay Sat, 15 May 2004 09:29:40 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=795#comment-3571 ?????? ??????

]]>