Comments on: I’m not the only man in a hanbok http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/ Korea... in Blog Format Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:59:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Rhesus http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2738 Rhesus Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:22:57 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2738 Marmot: "I've worn nothing but a hanbok for the last five or six years" Marmot:

“I’ve worn nothing but a hanbok for the last five or six years”

]]> By: Toolboy http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2737 Toolboy Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:53:14 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2737 Ah, Korea's most famous unemployed person. Ah, Korea’s most famous unemployed person.

]]> By: Brendon Carr http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2736 Brendon Carr Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:34:44 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2736 Robert, I know you wear hanbok. (Don't understand it, but I know it.) Not only is that fact in the title to this very weblog entry, but also you've commented on it in the past. That reference was a sly dig at *you*, sir, but offered in the spirit of good fun. By the way, can you drop me an e-mail? Robert, I know you wear hanbok. (Don’t understand it, but I know it.) Not only is that fact in the title to this very weblog entry, but also you’ve commented on it in the past. That reference was a sly dig at *you*, sir, but offered in the spirit of good fun.

By the way, can you drop me an e-mail?

]]> By: The Marmot http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2735 The Marmot Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:18:38 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2735 I would also suggest you tone down your Chosun Ilbo comments. They do pay you. Dude, I can't make my comments about the Chosun any more tame. Especially considering that I agree with 75% of their stuff I link to on this blog. I would also suggest you tone down your Chosun Ilbo comments. They do pay you.

Dude, I can’t make my comments about the Chosun any more tame. Especially considering that I agree with 75% of their stuff I link to on this blog.

]]> By: kimchipig http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2734 kimchipig Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:07:55 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2734 You know, Marmot, I have a lot of respect for you and your skills. However, wearing garb that almost nobody wears anymore is not going to make you Korean. You see, one of these days, you are going to do something to piss off the powers that be in South Korea and your hanbok and Korean language skills will not be worth two cents on your way to the airport. Eventually, as with all whites in Korea who try to go native, this will happen. Attracting attention to yourself is not going to slow the process. I would also suggest you tone down your Chosun Ilbo comments. They do pay you. You know, Marmot,

I have a lot of respect for you and your skills. However, wearing garb that almost nobody wears anymore is not going to make you Korean. You see, one of these days, you are going to do something to piss off the powers that be in South Korea and your hanbok and Korean language skills will not be worth two cents on your way to the airport. Eventually, as with all whites in Korea who try to go native, this will happen. Attracting attention to yourself is not going to slow the process.

I would also suggest you tone down your Chosun Ilbo comments. They do pay you.

]]> By: The Marmot http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2733 The Marmot Mon, 22 Mar 2004 05:13:34 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2733 Scott -- Apparently, this was Cheong Wa Dae's doing. Scott — Apparently, this was Cheong Wa Dae’s doing.

]]> By: Scott http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2732 Scott Mon, 22 Mar 2004 05:07:47 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2732 Who staged that picture? Could I suggest that in the next he have a lone tear running down his cheek? Who staged that picture?

Could I suggest that in the next he have a lone tear running down his cheek?

]]> By: The Marmot http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2731 The Marmot Mon, 22 Mar 2004 04:33:39 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2731 Brendon, I've worn nothing but a hanbok for the last five or six years, although I occasionally sport a Mongolian shirt that the Mrs. bought for me in the Olde Country. Brendon, I’ve worn nothing but a hanbok for the last five or six years, although I occasionally sport a Mongolian shirt that the Mrs. bought for me in the Olde Country.

]]> By: Brendon Carr http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2730 Brendon Carr Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:53:36 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2730 I was right. Hanbok is the preferred garb of whack-jobs. I was right. Hanbok is the preferred garb of whack-jobs.

]]> By: Sugar Shin http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/03/21/im-not-the-only-man-in-a-hanbok/#comment-2729 Sugar Shin Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:44:12 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=638#comment-2729 I like the Cheong Wa Dae PR-picture. Ah, my thoughtful president is watching out of the window... a Hanbok looks more peacefully than a pilot flight suit. Maybe (acutally impeached) President Roh should send President Bush a wonderful Hanbok as a present. I like the Cheong Wa Dae PR-picture.
Ah, my thoughtful president is watching out of the window…
a Hanbok looks more peacefully than a pilot flight suit. Maybe (acutally impeached) President Roh should send President Bush a wonderful Hanbok as a present.

]]>