<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Korea in 2040</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/</link>
	<description>Korea... in Blog Format</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: I</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>Result of Inferiority complex.


PING:
TITLE: Map Stupidity
BLOG NAME: Flit(tm)
And here I thought that only the Balkans spawned stupid "Greater" (insert favored nation here) maps that did nothing but piss off neighbors are raise the likelihood of war and scare off international investment. Nope. It turns out Koreans can...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Result of Inferiority complex.</p>
<p>PING:<br />
TITLE: Map Stupidity<br />
BLOG NAME: Flit(tm)<br />
And here I thought that only the Balkans spawned stupid &#8220;Greater&#8221; (insert favored nation here) maps that did nothing but piss off neighbors are raise the likelihood of war and scare off international investment. Nope. It turns out Koreans can&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanti</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>Take it easy, guys. It's just a joke.
Nobody think/want that will come true.

dda,
Some people have called it ??흹??쨈 while some others ?????쨈 since long ago. (Much longer than the 'last few years' you said.) Though I don't think it's right when they should be called internationally, calling name of the sea according to the direction is just a custom of Korea. Don't take it too seriously. ?????쨈??? was also called ??흹??쨈??? in the old days. Check this page. 
&lt;a href="http://www.hwanghaedo.or.kr/sub_pages/sanchun.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.hwanghaedo.or.kr/sub_pages/sanchun.htm&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it easy, guys. It&#8217;s just a joke.<br />
Nobody think/want that will come true.</p>
<p>dda,<br />
Some people have called it ??흹??쨈 while some others ?????쨈 since long ago. (Much longer than the &#8216;last few years&#8217; you said.) Though I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right when they should be called internationally, calling name of the sea according to the direction is just a custom of Korea. Don&#8217;t take it too seriously. ?????쨈??? was also called ??흹??쨈??? in the old days. Check this page.<br />
<a href="http://www.hwanghaedo.or.kr/sub_pages/sanchun.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hwanghaedo.or.kr/sub_pages/sanchun.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Xu</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Xu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 04:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>It is an interesting picture to all other people except Chinese. It is a joke ,isn`t it? But many Chinese would be very angry soon after they saw this. We also like to make fun,for life need this ,but I`m sure ,you will all agree with me ,police is not good material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an interesting picture to all other people except Chinese. It is a joke ,isn`t it? But many Chinese would be very angry soon after they saw this. We also like to make fun,for life need this ,but I`m sure ,you will all agree with me ,police is not good material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iu</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>iu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>??징?쩌흸????쩌흸???????쨍짯??쩍?쩔??흹짢??씲?쩌흸??쩍??????챈째???쩍?쩌??짠??째짹?쨘???◈?쨘??쩌흸챈?씲뮨???흹??쩌흸?쨍??쨘?????흹짢?짚짠??™?쩌흸?쨍?챈????쩔?짚짠?쨍??쨘짠?쩌흸?????째챈쨔쩐챈짯???쩍??쨍??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??징?쩌흸????쩌흸???????쨍짯??쩍?쩔??흹짢??씲?쩌흸??쩍??????챈째???쩍?쩌??짠??째짹?쨘???◈?쨘??쩌흸챈?씲뮨???흹??쩌흸?쨍??쨘?????흹짢?짚짠??™?쩌흸?쨍?챈????쩔?짚짠?쨍??쨘짠?쩌흸?????째챈쨔쩐챈짯???쩍??쨍??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dda</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>dda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>I'm going off the Korea Times and Korea Herald
Not exactly the best sources on Korea...
The fact that in the last few years people have called ?????쨈 ??흹??쨈, mainly in order to justify ?????쨈, is not really a strong argument regarding the name of this little sea. As I said before, the name of one Korean ????comes from this sea (?????쨈???/???챈?쨌????. So Koreans, for political motivations, might want to ignore their own history and geography, but it is hardly convincing.

Revisionism at its best: the 'new' 챈짼?챈쨌쨍??쨀

???~???, ??쩔챈?쨌????sic) ?쨈??짼흹??쨈~??쩌?????쨀쨀??? ???????쨌흹??쩌?????쨋???쨈 ??쨈???~?????째...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going off the Korea Times and Korea Herald<br />
Not exactly the best sources on Korea&#8230;<br />
The fact that in the last few years people have called ?????쨈 ??흹??쨈, mainly in order to justify ?????쨈, is not really a strong argument regarding the name of this little sea. As I said before, the name of one Korean ????comes from this sea (?????쨈???/???챈?쨌????. So Koreans, for political motivations, might want to ignore their own history and geography, but it is hardly convincing.</p>
<p>Revisionism at its best: the &#8216;new&#8217; 챈짼?챈쨌쨍??쨀</p>
<p>???~???, ??쩔챈?쨌????sic) ?쨈??짼흹??쨈~??쩌?????쨀쨀??? ???????쨌흹??쩌?????쨋???쨈 ??쨈???~?????째&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iu</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>iu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>??쨔?쨍짯??쩍?쨘쨘챈????쨈챈???쨍?챈???짚짧챈짰??쩔??쨘??쩌?
?쨍??쩔?≥┖볛?쨍??쨘??쨍짯??쩍?쨘쨘?쨔?챈?쨀챈??챈??챈흹????챈???쨍짯??쩍???챈짰?챈째??흹째?쩌흸?????≤?쨍흹????쨘???쇕?쨍짯?쨘??쩌흸???????????????
??짧챈??챈??챈쨌?????쨌짼?????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??쨔?쨍짯??쩍?쨘쨘챈????쨈챈???쨍?챈???짚짧챈짰??쩔??쨘??쩌?<br />
?쨍??쩔?≥┖볛?쨍??쨘??쨍짯??쩍?쨘쨘?쨔?챈?쨀챈??챈??챈흹????챈???쨍짯??쩍???챈짰?챈째??흹째?쩌흸?????≤?쨍흹????쨘???쇕?쨍짯?쨘??쩌흸???????????????<br />
??짧챈??챈??챈쨌?????쨌짼?????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedge</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1850</guid>
		<description>I'm going off the Korea Times and Korea Herald, plus what my English students called it.  I always heard West Sea, not Yellow Sea, from all Korean sources.  Of course, I wasn't reading hanja in the vernacular papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going off the Korea Times and Korea Herald, plus what my English students called it.  I always heard West Sea, not Yellow Sea, from all Korean sources.  Of course, I wasn&#8217;t reading hanja in the vernacular papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2004 21:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>Hey Ari, lighten up!  All the Marmot said was "Hey, some people can dream, can' t they?".  This is pure entertainment.  I'm sure Bae spent a lot of time on his computer making that nice picture for us to laugh at.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ari, lighten up!  All the Marmot said was &#8220;Hey, some people can dream, can&#8217; t they?&#8221;.  This is pure entertainment.  I&#8217;m sure Bae spent a lot of time on his computer making that nice picture for us to laugh at.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dda</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>dda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>No, Wedge, youre're right, I dunno where you come from. But I get your point now...
'They called it West Sea in 1993...'
We'll have to define 'they'. I remember translating a Korean magazine article about ???챈?쨌 in the late 1990s. It would be interesting to see a study made on the DNS-like propagation of the "West Sea" usage. Gonna be tough on the ?쨀???쨈???s to explain West Sea when Korea reunifies. Or are they gonna change ???챈?쨌????to ??쩔챈?쨌????to justify West Sea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Wedge, youre&#8217;re right, I dunno where you come from. But I get your point now&#8230;<br />
&#8216;They called it West Sea in 1993&#8230;&#8217;<br />
We&#8217;ll have to define &#8216;they&#8217;. I remember translating a Korean magazine article about ???챈?쨌 in the late 1990s. It would be interesting to see a study made on the DNS-like propagation of the &#8220;West Sea&#8221; usage. Gonna be tough on the ?쨀???쨈???s to explain West Sea when Korea reunifies. Or are they gonna change ???챈?쨌????to ??쩔챈?쨌????to justify West Sea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedge</title>
		<link>http://www.rjkoehler.com/2004/02/05/korea-in-2040/#comment-1847</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2004 14:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rjkoehler.com/?p=511#comment-1847</guid>
		<description>DDA - I'm not sure you know where I'm coming from since sarcasm is sometimes tough to imply on paper, so let me say I expected him to change it to West Sea (although I know Yellow Sea has been used by us English-speakers for centuries).  They called it West Sea in 1993 and I'll defer to anyone in Korea previous to that to identify when they changed it from Yellow Sea.

Speaking of seas, Japan calls the Sea of Japan something like North Coast Sea and the body to the south the opposite (my Japanese dictionary is packed up so someone else correct this if I'm wrong).  It's all relative to the individual country.  Only in Korea do they try to impose their local usage on others.  Inferiority complexes are a bitch, aren't they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DDA - I&#8217;m not sure you know where I&#8217;m coming from since sarcasm is sometimes tough to imply on paper, so let me say I expected him to change it to West Sea (although I know Yellow Sea has been used by us English-speakers for centuries).  They called it West Sea in 1993 and I&#8217;ll defer to anyone in Korea previous to that to identify when they changed it from Yellow Sea.</p>
<p>Speaking of seas, Japan calls the Sea of Japan something like North Coast Sea and the body to the south the opposite (my Japanese dictionary is packed up so someone else correct this if I&#8217;m wrong).  It&#8217;s all relative to the individual country.  Only in Korea do they try to impose their local usage on others.  Inferiority complexes are a bitch, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
