Comments on: Rep. Kim Song-ho rips Iraq report http://www.rjkoehler.com/2003/10/07/rep-kim-song-ho-rips-iraq-report/ Korea... in Blog Format Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:45:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: gator http://www.rjkoehler.com/2003/10/07/rep-kim-song-ho-rips-iraq-report/#comment-296 gator Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:48:44 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=124#comment-296 this article - actually excerpts from a new book titled The Other Lies of George Bush - shows how Bush has mislead the fact about the invasion of Iraq. <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031013&s=corn" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031013&s=corn</a> PING: TITLE: Impression Formation under Cognitive Busyness BLOG NAME: GatorLog: A blogger's monologue ??쨈??짚 ?????쩌??쨈??? ?????흸, ??쨔????????짹쨈 (event)??? ?흸???흹 ??쨍?????? ?????짹??흹??짚?????짼???????째??? ??쨋??? ?째???? ?쨍째?쨀쨍?????쨍 ??쩌??쨈??짚. ??쨈 ??쨍??? ?????짹??? ?짚??????짢??? ??쩌?째흸?쨍째 ?째??흸흸??흹 Heider?????흸???쨍?쨈??쨀??????흹 ?째흹?????? ??? ?????????쨈??쨍?째??... PING: TITLE: Korea Briefing: 2003-10-14 BLOG NAME: Winds of Change.NET OCT 14/03 TOPICS INCL: Must-read article; Asian values; Total Recall in SK too?; Wider regional role for USFK; NK Developments; Nukes updates; What to do about NK?; Lifestyles of the Rich and Stalinist; ROK forces to Iraq?; Food aid to NK; NK's economy... this article - actually excerpts from a new book titled The Other Lies of George Bush - shows how Bush has mislead the fact about the invasion of Iraq.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.m.....amp;s=corn

PING:
TITLE: Impression Formation under Cognitive Busyness

BLOG NAME: GatorLog: A blogger’s monologue
??쨈??짚 ?????쩌??쨈??? ?????흸, ??쨔????????짹쨈 (event)??? ?흸???흹 ??쨍?????? ?????짹??흹??짚?????짼???????째??? ??쨋??? ?째???? ?쨍째?쨀쨍?????쨍 ??쩌??쨈??짚. ??쨈 ??쨍??? ?????짹??? ?짚??????짢??? ??쩌?째흸?쨍째 ?째??흸흸??흹 Heider?????흸???쨍?쨈??쨀??????흹 ?째흹?????? ??? ?????????쨈??쨍?째??…

PING:
TITLE: Korea Briefing: 2003-10-14
BLOG NAME: Winds of Change.NET
OCT 14/03 TOPICS INCL: Must-read article; Asian values; Total Recall in SK too?; Wider regional role for USFK; NK Developments; Nukes updates; What to do about NK?; Lifestyles of the Rich and Stalinist; ROK forces to Iraq?; Food aid to NK; NK’s economy…

]]> By: The Marmot http://www.rjkoehler.com/2003/10/07/rep-kim-song-ho-rips-iraq-report/#comment-295 The Marmot Thu, 09 Oct 2003 05:32:47 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=124#comment-295 Thanks for the comment - and many more thanks for the trackback and link. I'm going to respond to your comment once I go through all the relevant data on the survey over at the Program on International Policy Attitudes. I must warn you, however - I'm not an expert on American TV media, which I hardly watch anymore (with the exception of CNN, which is hardly a bastion of right-wing conservatism). Thanks for the comment - and many more thanks for the trackback and link. I’m going to respond to your comment once I go through all the relevant data on the survey over at the Program on International Policy Attitudes. I must warn you, however - I’m not an expert on American TV media, which I hardly watch anymore (with the exception of CNN, which is hardly a bastion of right-wing conservatism).

]]> By: ????짹째 http://www.rjkoehler.com/2003/10/07/rep-kim-song-ho-rips-iraq-report/#comment-294 ????짹째 Wed, 08 Oct 2003 20:18:33 +0000 http://rjkoehler.com/?p=124#comment-294 to "the Marmot???"..."Actually it is not related to this issue. But I'd like to discuss your comment left in Holloblog. Sorry about that.... Well, at a first glance, I also thought whether the "eggs-first-or-chickens-first" irony that you left in Holloblog. Regarding Fox viewers' seriously distorted memory on the US's Iraq invasion, neither you nor me can claim which one comes first unless we study this issue in an experimentally controlled study. Maybe, we need an aditional content analysis for the coverage of US's Iraq invasion. However, based on my monitoring of the invasion and the media coverage during that period, I'd like to blame the media rather than viewers for Fox viewers' skewed incorrect memories. Of course, there is a tendecy that conservatives enjoy watching biased media such as Fox news or Rush Limbaugh. It is very similar that Chosun Ilbo's bulletinboard (100??????? is filled with the right's or sometimes extremely fascist's flaming against Rho's democratic government and its supporters. They love those biased media in that they can feel some catharsis from listening to "Rush" or reading "Jo, GapJe(?징째?째???흹)." Of course, I enjoy listening to Rush and reading Jo, which may surprise you, (in fact, I really hate them). Anyway, everybody knows that the conservatives enjoys Fox news. Then, a question is that whether conservatives are stupid enough to show their false memory for two key Iraq-related issues. The answer is "No." I don't think conservatives are not so stupid as they show their stupid memoires for the key facts that even I (=a stupid person) know the correct answer. Two things need to be considered. What is my source of information? I rely on newspapers to get news or information. However, most Americans rely on television to catch news or natioanl agendas. Many researchers has demonstrated that there is a knowledge gap of public affairs between NP users and TV viewers. This is the first reason that I attribute their false memory to the Fox or FoxNEWS rather than the conservative bias. My hypothesis is that viewers of TV news are more likely to remember the facts of Iraq invasion incorrectly. Second, even though you stated a very serious (^^) remarks that "Fox's viewers selected the Fox NEWS because of its patriotic perspective," even a conservative media critic admits that "the War coverage is filled with patriotism." In other words, it was not just Fox that sent the biased American imperialistic view during the Iraq invasion. Alsmost all US media did. Thus, assume that there is no difference in US media coverage in dealing with Iraq invasion. Then, what makes these differences of false memories depending on viewers' favorable television news sources. I'd like to blame the conservative Fox's detailed but quite biased "commentaries" on several issues of the Iraq invasion. Not only did the FOX NEWS deliver a biased view to the audience, but also it may have diluted the fact emphasizing "suspicous (but quite old and worn-out) stuffs" for the proof of weapons of destruction. (??╈€????쨔???? ?짧???짼? ?쨈짚?????째.....?짯? ?쨔? ?쨍째??? ??? ?째??????짼? ??쑣??샕??흹??쨈??흹 ??쨈?짼흸 ?흸??????쨈?????쨈?쨍째??쩌 ?짠흸??쑣??짚??????흹????째???짚?쨀? ?쨀쨍??짚???????....???????째? ?쨌쨍 ??? ?짠???? ????????™€??짚???????^^). to “the Marmot???”…”Actually it is not related to this issue. But I’d like to discuss your comment left in Holloblog. Sorry about that….
Well, at a first glance, I also thought whether the “eggs-first-or-chickens-first” irony that you left in Holloblog. Regarding Fox viewers’ seriously distorted memory on the US’s Iraq invasion, neither you nor me can claim which one comes first unless we study this issue in an experimentally controlled study. Maybe, we need an aditional content analysis for the coverage of US’s Iraq invasion. However, based on my monitoring of the invasion and the media coverage during that period, I’d like to blame the media rather than viewers for Fox viewers’ skewed incorrect memories.
Of course, there is a tendecy that conservatives enjoy watching biased media such as Fox news or Rush Limbaugh. It is very similar that Chosun Ilbo’s bulletinboard (100??????? is filled with the right’s or sometimes extremely fascist’s flaming against Rho’s democratic government and its supporters. They love those biased media in that they can feel some catharsis from listening to “Rush” or reading “Jo, GapJe(?징째?째???흹).” Of course, I enjoy listening to Rush and reading Jo, which may surprise you, (in fact, I really hate them).
Anyway, everybody knows that the conservatives enjoys Fox news. Then, a question is that whether conservatives are stupid enough to show their false memory for two key Iraq-related issues. The answer is “No.” I don’t think conservatives are not so stupid as they show their stupid memoires for the key facts that even I (=a stupid person) know the correct answer.
Two things need to be considered.
What is my source of information? I rely on newspapers to get news or information. However, most Americans rely on television to catch news or natioanl agendas. Many researchers has demonstrated that there is a knowledge gap of public affairs between NP users and TV viewers. This is the first reason that I attribute their false memory to the Fox or FoxNEWS rather than the conservative bias. My hypothesis is that viewers of TV news are more likely to remember the facts of Iraq invasion incorrectly.
Second, even though you stated a very serious (^^) remarks that “Fox’s viewers selected the Fox NEWS because of its patriotic perspective,” even a conservative media critic admits that “the War coverage is filled with patriotism.” In other words, it was not just Fox that sent the biased American imperialistic view during the Iraq invasion. Alsmost all US media did. Thus, assume that there is no difference in US media coverage in dealing with Iraq invasion. Then, what makes these differences of false memories depending on viewers’ favorable television news sources. I’d like to blame the conservative Fox’s detailed but quite biased “commentaries” on several issues of the Iraq invasion. Not only did the FOX NEWS deliver a biased view to the audience, but also it may have diluted the fact emphasizing “suspicous (but quite old and worn-out) stuffs” for the proof of weapons of destruction. (??╈€????쨔???? ?짧???짼? ?쨈짚?????째…..?짯? ?쨔? ?쨍째??? ??? ?째??????짼? ??쑣??샕??흹??쨈??흹 ??쨈?짼흸 ?흸??????쨈?????쨈?쨍째??쩌 ?짠흸??쑣??짚??????흹????째???짚?쨀? ?쨀쨍??짚???????….???????째? ?쨌쨍 ??? ?짠???? ????????™€??짚???????^^).

]]>